| Author |
Topic: Another electro-possiblity! |
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 06-17-99 07:16 PM
This Concerns a patents I looked up at "http//www.patents.ibm.com". The
patent is called "Preparation of dihydroaromatic hydrocarbons". It
produces 1,4 dihydro-products. It's number is US4187156. To search for it
just enter 4187156.
A REVIEW: Now if you remember my previous post called "new
electro-methods" I explained that since there is a OH on ephedrine right
next to the benzene group once the benzene group becomes a dihydro- the OH
swallows the 1 position hydrogen to form water and the 4 position hydrogen
saturates the double bond where the OH used to be.
The neat thing about this patent is that it takes place with a
undivided cell with water. The electrolyte is a quaternary ammonium
hydroxide.
Read the patent abstract below- Read it carefully. If you visit the
website you can see the accual patent with a more detailed description of
the cathode and whatnot...
US4187156: Preparation of dihydroaromatic hydrocarbons View Images
(9 pages) | View Cart
------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Inventor(s):Coleman;
James P. , Maryland Heights, MO Wagenknecht; John H. , Kirchwood, MO
Applicant(s):Monsanto Company, St. Louis, MO
Issued/Filed Dates:Feb. 5, 1980 / Dec. 21, 1977
Application Number:US1977000862719
IPC Class:C25B 003/04;
Class:Current: 205/463; Original: 204/073.R;
Field of Search:204/73 R,59 R
Abstract:Electrolytic reduction at the cathode of aromatic hydrocarbons
in an aqueous emulsive electrolysis medium in an undivided electrolytic
cell yields dihydroaromatic hydrocarbons.
Attorney, Agent, or Firm:Brooks; Wendell W.; Williams, Jr.; James W.;
Kennedy; Joseph D.;
Primary/Assistant Examiners:Kaplan; G. L.;
U.S. References: Show the 2 patents that reference this one Patent
Issued Inventor(s) TitleUS3682791*8 /1972 Matthews US3682794*8 /1972
Matthews US3684669*8 /1972 Matthews US3699020*10 /1972 Connolly et
al. US3700572*10 /1972 Hatayama et al. * some details unavailable
First Claim:Show all 10 claims
What is claimed is: 1. A process for the preparation of
dihydroaromatic hydrocarbons which comprises electrolytic reduction at the
cathode in an undivided electrolytic cell by passing a direct electric
current through a basic aqueous emulsive electrolysis medium comprising an
aromatic hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of benzene,
biphenyl, naphthalene, and alkyl derivatives thereof having 1 to 4 carbon
atoms and an aqueous solution of a quaternary ammonium hydroxide to yield
the dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon, wherein the electrolytic reduction is
conducted in the substantial absence of amine salts. 2. The process of
claim 1 wherein the aromatic hydrocarbon is benzene and the
dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon is 1,4-cyclohexadiene. 3. The process of
claim 1 wherein the quaternary ammonium hydroxide is a tetraalkylammonium
hydroxide. 4. A process for the preparation of dihydroaromatic
hydrocarbons which comprises electrolytic reduction at the cathode in an
undivided electrolytic cell by passing a direct electric current through a
basic aqueous emulsive electrolysis medium comprising an aromatic
hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of benzene, biphenyl,
naphthalene, and alkyl derivatives thereof having 1 to 4 carbon atoms and
an aqueous solution of a quaternary ammonium hydroxide to yield the
dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon, wherein the concentration of the quaternary
ammonium hydroxide is maintained by removal of carboxylate ions formed in
situ in the electrolysis medium and simultaneous replacement by hydroxide
ions. 5. The process of claim 4 wherein the carboxylate ions being
removed are exchanged for hydroxide ions via alkaline or basic ion
exchange. 6. The process of claim 4 wherein the carboxylate ions being
removed are replaced by hydroxide ions via electrodialysis. 7. A
process for the preparation of dihydroaromatic hydrocarbons which
comprises electrolytic reduction at the cathode in an undivided
electrolytic cell by passing a direct electric current through a basic
aqueous emulsive electrolysis medium comprising an aromatic hydrocarbon
selected from the group consisting of benzene, biphenyl, naphthalene, and
alkyl derivatives thereof having 1 to 4 carbon atoms and an aqueous
solution of a quaternary ammonium hydroxide, in absence of amines or
ammonia to yield the dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon, the anode in the cell
being of conductive material causing very little reoxidation of
dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon, being a de Nora-type dimensionally stable
anode, and in which a cathode selected from mercury, zinc, lead or cadmium
is used. 8. A process for the preparation of dihydroaromatic
hydrocarbons which comprises electrolytic reduction at the cathode in an
undivided electrolytic cell by passing a direct electric current through a
basic aqueous emulsive electrolysis medium comprising an aromatic
hydrocarbon selected from the group consisting of benzenes, biphenyl,
naphthalene, and alkyl derivatives thereof having 1 to 4 carbon atoms and
an aqueous solution of a quaternary ammonium hydroxide, in absence of
amines or ammonia to yield the dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon, the anode in
the cell being of conductive material causing very little reoxidation of
dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon, being stainless steel. 9. A process for
the preparation of dihydroaromatic hydrocarbons which comprises
electrolytic reduction at the cathode in an undivided electrolytic cell by
passing a direct electric current through a basic aqueous emulsive
electrolysis medium comprising an aromatic hydrocarbon selected from the
group consisting of benzene, biphenyl, naphthalene, and alkyl derivatives
thereof having 1 to 4 carbon atoms and an aqueous solution of a quaternary
ammonium hydroxide, in absence of amines or ammonia to yield the
dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon, the anode in the cell being of conductive
material causing very little reoxidation of dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon,
being made of precious metal oxides plated on a titanium substrate.
10. A process for the preparation of dihydroaromatic hydrocarbons
which comprises electrolytic reduction at the cathode in an undivided
electrolytic cell by passing a direct electric current through a basic
aqueous emulsive electrolysis medium comprising an aromatic hydrocarbon
selected from the group consisting of benzene, biphenyl, naphthalene, and
alkyl derivatives thereof having 1 to 4 carbon atoms and an aqueous
solution of a quaternary ammonium hydroxide, in absence of amines or
ammonia to yield the dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon, the anode in the cell
being of conductive material causing very little reoxidation of
dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon, being nickel.
Foreign References:none
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 07-03-99 04:56 PM
The quartenary ammonium hydroxide can be found in water bed
conditioners.
The anode is nickel.
The cathode is zinc or lead.
The medium is distilled water.
The reduced compound is (psuedo)ephedrine.
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 07-03-99 05:21 PM
Also, Molar ratio of Quartenary ammonium hydroxide to aromatic
hydrocarbon is 2:1 to 5:1. With .05 to 10 amperes, or more, per sq cm.
|
dwarfer Member |
posted 07-07-99 02:01 PM
Geeze, Chem guy: this was an unappreciated little gem you threw into the
inofrmation pond: shoulda made bigger ripples.
Sure seems to fill the bill for quik'n e z : have you had any practical
experience with application of this technique??
Still lookin' at 3,000 coulombs per gram? No voltage parameters: just
current density?
I owe you still the alcohol/aluminum/cathode protection experiment: but
time in the "lab" has been scarce as the proverbial hens teeth so far this
summer and will continue to be so 'till August.
regards, dwarfer
So many paths: so little time!
|
dwarfer Member |
posted 07-08-99 05:56 PM
hey Chem Guy:
Isn't this a Birch Reaction (in essence) without having to get
anhydrous ammonia or lithium or other difficult items??
Maybe this should be called
"ELECTRO BIRCH"
Are you set up to do an experiment with this??
Damn I must be missing something: this looks TOO easy.
OP: Where's my nickle??
Wait: aren't 5 cent pieces pure nickle??
do not I have an oxyacetylene torch??
shit the regulators are being fixed.
The only thing I'm confused about is the "substantial absence of amine
salts"??
Is this route to honey fields just super easy or am I flagellating my
neurons for nothing??
dwarfer
|
Optimus
Prime Member |
posted 07-09-99 04:40 AM
to yield the dihydroaromatic hydrocarbon, wherein the electrolytic
reduction is conducted in the substantial absence of amine salts.
Yea, but applies to mabye others no... paa???
OP
|
dwarfer Member |
posted 07-09-99 12:59 PM
You mean that that silly little nitrogen constitutes "substantial amine
salts"??, therefore making the process inapplicable??
Say it ain't so.
sunofabitch
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 07-09-99 05:21 PM
DWARFER,... Let me be the first to say...
IT AIN'T SO!!!!
If you visited "http//www.patents.ibm.com" and read the scanned pages
you would have seen that the process can occur both ways. They only said
that "the electrolytic reduction is conducted in the substantial absence
of amine salts" because it is more econmicly prudent to do so. Also the
ephedrine would only be an amine salt if it was Eph-HCl or some such
nonesense.
The article gives no voltage because it is a general patent and not in
the business of producing illegal substances. I would use the Al in
ethanol experiment to provide a workable voltage for this experiment.
Also nickels aren't pure nickel, I don't think. They are like all other
coins. They have a zinc layer sandwiched in the middle. The Merck says
that Zn dissolves in 28% ammonia water. Nickel however does not. This is
also, maybe, a good way to get silver from quaters?
|
dwarfer Member |
posted 07-09-99 06:45 PM
Nickels are probably an alloy: but predominently Ni. (Not a sandwich)
I recall some concern about their carcinogenicity a few years ago.
My recollection on the aluminum cathode alcohol experiment was just to
see if it would be protected. Is there some other v or i variables you
want to see tested?
Also, inasmuch as the patent holders went to some lengths to specify
anodes that would not contribute to oxidation, would it not be feasible
just to use the cathode cell in a two-part system? Unless I missed picking
it up, the anode was im-material except as a "negative" (in a perjorative
sense) to be avoided.
Oh goodie another route to add to my experiment list.
dwarfer
|
FMAN Member |
posted 07-10-99 04:43 PM
OK SO, they use water and the elecro gadget to make ephedrine.....
Then solution is to reverse the process
First reduce the the, then oxidize it and likewise anhydrously!
Rock-on
---Amethystium---
|
bloodgod100 Member |
posted 07-10-99 05:25 PM
I swear to god FMAN, you're using punctuation is freaking me out. What did
you do on your vacation anyhow? -bg
|
Optimus
Prime Member |
posted 07-11-99 02:43 PM
FMAN: Did I read in another post that you thought you might know someone
related to the person who can get in touch with the guy that might trade
lasers for parr vessels...?? Please e-mail me if you
would... op70@hotmail.com
gracias OP
|
Tweaky
Bird Member |
posted 07-11-99 03:26 PM
This type of reaction sounds just like what AbSoLuTe might be dreamin'
about.
Try getting him to elaborate on his new dream.
AbSoLuTe! You out there?
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 07-18-99 11:15 AM
Dwarfer,
If you use a divided cell the reductions and oxidations are usually
more vigirous. This can be countered by lower voltages.
I wonder if this would produce the same blue coloring as the birch
reductions and the electro birch reductions? Or do you think that is
caused by the metal and not by the electrons?
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 07-21-99 02:42 PM
Has any one tryed this?
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 07-24-99 04:44 PM
Just about a month ago electro-reductions is all anybody could think
about, what happened? Has everyone lost their imagination?
|
dwarfer Member |
posted 07-24-99 05:28 PM
I've been on vacation for two weeks.
This is interesting and I have it stashed away for future
consideration, but presently am preoccupied with ZnCl2 and a new machine
type.
I'm a lookie loo on this one!

|
dwarfer Member |
posted 08-02-99 08:13 PM
Also, have a friend who is in the process of obtaining a solid pure nickel
slug fer to maybe mess with.
How about you, Chem Guy: You have the opportunity to mess wid dis
one??
|
FMAN Member |
posted 08-03-99 05:06 AM
Man I tried the electro thingy and it makes something but it aint what my
palete is accostomed to my man!
Ok so we really like the shrown on the electroshit still, wana rent?
CURTAINS?
...............////////////
Ok so we, there are some problems with the machine? Ya dont say ,,,,hum
it may take FMAN a while tost find his way through the maze to the end
therin found?
The # 1 problem is that the dang thing has got no fucking shild man,
the thing is all wack!!!!ooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
EEEEEEEEERRRRRRRRRRRRR
ok so which is in there and why dont they sell the good shit to the
pupic aliars?
Man-I-Found-um-THINK - GOLD - OVERHEREMAN!!!
Ok, so what the heck is in the dame thing ????
Clorine? Cloride? Hydrogen? Carbon? Monoxide? Carbon
Dioxide? Oxygen? Superoxide? Monoxide? Peroclorate? Peroxide?
|
dwarfer Member |
posted 08-03-99 01:37 PM
EEEEEEEEE lOOOOOOOOOO ci DATE, FMAN:
shed light; make clear; you are saying the stuff you can get OTC
doesn't work??
(PS: Have not been able to get microcellulose to distill over yet:
please clarify your technique on that too.)
|
FMAN Member |
posted 08-03-99 09:04 PM
Well now then it has been posted and I dont distil because I did not apply
for a permit from the Atbtf..........It the method concerning legal
procurement and engoyment for responsible individuals is a freedom.
The thing does get rid of the water this is ecentially a dehydration of
the solvent, not fucking water!
---Amethystium---
|
FMAN Member |
posted 08-03-99 09:06 PM
PS.......
And that same philandering idea goes for the HCl Generater
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 08-06-99 06:25 PM
FMAN, What the hell are you saying? Did you try this? I think you
should and tell all the results.
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 08-26-99 05:37 PM
I read a book about solvated electrons that said that the alkali metal
solutions and cathode generated electron solutions are optically
identical!
Therefore one can create a "blue" solution with this method.
My opinion would be that this method would indeed reduce the benzyl
alcohol to an aromatic hydrocarbon in comparable yeilds to Birch
reductions (AKA 90% yeild by molar comparasion)
|
Snotbrain Member |
posted 08-26-99 06:56 PM
Well this idea certainly has a lot of promise but I wish sombody would
give it a try and let us looky loo's in on the results.
i recently came across an ultrasonic cleaning bath, stainless steel, :
I wonder what it would be good for. draws about 50 watts.
Wonder if a dilute acid bath working on a benzyl compound with a
chlorine replacement where the hydroxy usta be would effect replacement of
the chlorine atom??
different subject: sorry.
snodder
|
FMAN Member |
posted 08-26-99 06:58 PM
it will work problem is technical only...
Mainstay is generate HCL first to this argument, unless ya discover how
to make dry HCL with the electro I doubt it will improve really anythign
of interest to me, But this is the insight I have the thingy also makes
Clear slimmy stuff and such might be Cloroaddproduct interesting huh?
ChCl3 Formalin, I just dont got the basic shit to figure this out it the
electro drives current technology transfer, the shity thing makes alot
more shit than plain nobel gas like O2 H2 Cl Naoh Allot is happening in
there like peroxide formation and stuff, this is the basic evolution of
greater discoveries, unless ya just plain skip electro and go onto
microwave, I just am never in a hury during to quest to discover these
things really.... ---Amethystium---
To sum up the mater some ingenious individuals have been making alot of
money with this basement technology and experimenting on your own and
sharing the resultant will be worth your time but others will insist maybe
even take action should you divert the deeds, maybe hjust be carefull and
analytical in your aproach the thingy might blow up ok????NO?
Take thingy with two upside down glasses tubes plastic whatever, Place
wires thin under the lip edge now on upsidedown Run an l type one way
sucker in there with syringe attached like a one way vacume pump. The
thing could have a middle hollow shank or some straw shaped like an L,,,ok
so the shank idea ok,,,the shank trhough some wood or plastic or ceramic
ow whatever a base like a lamp shank ok,,,,now drill a hole are ya kidding
make another like shank go in there now ya got a slidding thing on the
inside this is going to do whatever ya want ok....No ya drill some holes
in there at different levels if ya want or if only extracting top gass,
well some gasses are heavy...um well ya can figure it out on your own ok,
the technology is concerning magnetic sheilding and such rember to bigass
spark generators thought so ok they supposabbly twist and turn and stuff
kinda like a reverse microwave oven maybe I dont know...They just aint
bragging about it ok? So the shank is in there and it the gas sucker is
adgustable the safter ok this is the saftey shank ok????
The shank is hollowed through or negative pressure is the driving
factor it dont mater the setup should be different and unique for your
eludification ok,,The base is covered in rubber from inner tubethe cups
are sucktioned into plase or if ussing different pressurizations ya then
bolt the cups down, understand a vacume bell and pressure chamber ok this
is really so simple in my mind ok, what it does only a few have
entertained most of are a brain dead ok get buzzzy and ya will reap with
what ya sow so sow well then....
|
FMAN Member |
posted 08-26-99 07:16 PM
Makes a A definatly DAM good stirrer!!! Pushes up a water
fountain makes from crystal and
occlitator really cool thingy want now find neb?????
|
FMAN Member |
posted 08-26-99 07:41 PM
Snot I think Chem Guy is a GEEK and a dang cool one with brain to boot,
give him all the respect a humble person does derserve this guy cares
about us
Guy dont make or use drugs was recruited to help us, ok? Who he is is a
mystery I have recruited cops even ok?
This is a smorgasboard, there are some pro people he also, criminals
and cops, it is like public forum,,,Babylon ok.
Could be golden age I dont know where this leads but things is gona
change alot if we dont end up killing the dang thing, anyways I like to
talk write also....
Who cares, hapy sad like enemy it just does make seense....
Ok so the reduction in absence of amine goes on to produce from solvent
like possibly CHARCOAL FLUID????
Yep seems likely I really dont like saying this but it is very
plausable, I dont even know what the heck is in charcoal fluid neither it
must be the prefered mix though simple cheap readily available many
markets individual markets no doubt hard for the war effort and this stuff
is begining to fold down finally has reached meltpoint thank God....
Ok so the Nickle he has presumed ya can not screw up this note he
leaves he is only trying to help, he aint gona help ya kill your self
ok...
The metal and such also contains other stuff it is a group of
metals,,,ok
the clorine will do neat stuff, iodine , bromine, many others to play
with ok.....
In solvent it seems the solvent goes onto the dihydo state which means
something important he is teaching wisely this GUY
He the Chem GUY is way good ok
the thing reduses the solvent if.....
Well point is what if ya add the GOODS????
Well maybe it does do something in solvent,,,,
And it also does somethign in water....
And it does something in a one container method and does so in
seperated container and does somethibng different with oscillating current
+_+_+_+_+_+_+_______++++++_+_+_+_+_+_ imagina all the variables
What ya are gona do if ya is a real buzy bee is probably discover some
new kinda drug????
Ok so get it correct some things like metal are soluable in water some
others are not soluable depending on the choice of metals and there
resultant interactions ya can do all kinds of techno stuff, not just make
dope
Dope is ok though but what I really whant is creative abbality to take
this platform onto better things like extracting active stuff from food
like choclate to make drugs to starve the frigging war dead man kill the
whole send nonviolent individuals to prision for what????ussing there
brain and getting ratted or rather having some retard beet them snicker
them to death or steal food from little kids and stuff.
There aint in my opinion with somebody doing harm to themselves no
problemo unless they dont cant figure they is harming themselves like why
stop someone from smoking a cigareete,,,why not make the ciggareeetes
safer
This I Hope explains the quest from the stanby I recieve from the
Mysterious individual,, recrit, or leader it really is allways serve to be
served in my opinion my have never served and wana be served and they just
plain dont derserve to be served and they dont know how to earn respect
without harming another person..
Man I think we are all rotten scum to the core all of us....Cops
criminals good bad alike we all very simmilar really\\
What is good is I got lots of time now to slow down and appreciate the
better things in life because I have one good friend...This is all I got
ONE GOOD FRIEND.
It is suffecient for me ONE.....
In water I aint gona pay 30 dollars for some chemical shit if I can
make better stuff for 30 cents or less, please man get a psychiatrist and
get a prescription till we straighten out this mess ok, GENEVA CONVENTION
STUFF IS COMPLICATED PORTION TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK
GUY BEST WHISH SEARCH ON GUY.....KEEP POSTING it drives um crazy the NAZI
or whatever I aint prejudice man Iam prejudice againt lies not truth,
unplug the tv man! ---FREEMASSON---
|
Snotbrain Member |
posted 08-27-99 07:18 PM
Good for you FMAN: one friend is more than many have:
Yeah, we are all scum sucking self involved idiots fer sure: but we all
have stardust and light also: at least almost all of us do.
And thanks to Chem Man and you and Zen and Worlock and OP and Abbie and
Thpitterdude all the other diverse people that share ??? and answers and
gems and bull shit here: with occasional visitations from the Chemical
Elite who sometimes help and sometimes ridicule: a subset of human nature
herein we find, just like any other place where "two or more are gathered
in my Name." ==========================
The difference between us and the fuzz is that they can be thugs and
get away with it: but lemmetellyawhat, as suckmoid as they can be in the
land of the free, they can be the literal Antichrist in some other lands:
so avoid em when you can and try to change the way things are going, but
also be appreciative of what we DO have: diminishing though it may be.
======================
ANY government that thinks that controlling access to information is
the way to effectively provide for the future is in reality cutting off
it's own fingers, hands, feet, flesh: and will ultimately bleed to death
on the pitchfork of the disenchanted population that finally says
"enough".
And here we have the second most densely populated prisons per 100,000:
only behind the ex soviet union: and 60% of those in jail are their for
non violent drug crimes.
What a charade!
and damn! Georgy Jr. might have insufflated some blow 25 years ago, but
since then he got religion, grew up, gave up drink, and is all for ZERO
tolerance.
Well guess what, Georgy:
FUCK YOU!
And the rest of you better than PRIGS that think you are sitting on the
right hand of God Almighty.
well, this oughta be in the couch: so off my bandstand/soapbox go I.
snodder
|
FMAN Member |
posted 08-28-99 03:58 PM
Keep it on topic does has anyone done this?????yet???? Stay
tuned....for the next episode..... ---Amethystium---
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 08-29-99 01:26 PM
Later this week I'll post a table of the half life of the "solvated
electron" in certain solvents. It's from a book I read, but didn't have
change to photocopy.
The same book talked about how you can create solvated electrons by
shooting them into solution from a particle accelerator. Cool shit is
abound in acedemia,...
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 09-06-99 07:57 PM
From "Electrons in Liquid Ammonia" by J.C. Thompson, 1976
"The fact that dilute solutions containing equivalents amounts
of alkali and alkaline metals give virtually the same
near-infrared absorption spectra indictaes the presence of a common
absorbing species which must be described without reference to the
cation. Indeed, dilute solutions of solvated electrons
electrochemically generated in the presence of tetraalkylammonium ions
with widely-varying structural parameters are also optically
indistinguishable from those formed by the dissolution of metal atoms."
From "The journal of Chemical Physics", Vol 44, number 6, page 2297,
15 march 1966.
"...The approximate times necessary at -78C for the optical
density due to the solvated electron to decay to one half its initial
value were 8, 20, 8, and 25 mirco-sec for mathanol, ethanol,
isopropanol, and n-butanol, respectively. These half-times are 10 to 20
times longer than the corresponding values at room tempature." "...
at -78C, absorptions due to the solvated electron were obtained for
monomethylamine (T[.5]= 3 mirco-sec) and monoethylamine (T[.5]= 3.5
mirco-sec). At -110C the absorption of the solvated electron in
diethylether was obtained (T[.5]= 2 mirco-sec)."
Here is a condensed table of the half-life of the solvated
electron in various solvents: (From the same work as above)
SUBATANCE/HALF-LIFE IN MIRCO-SECONDS [all measuements at 25C unless
otherwise stated] 100% glycerol / .44 63% glycerol- 37% water /
.75 47% " - 53% " / .9 32% " - 68% " / 1.6 19% " - 1% " /
1.5 8.3% " - 92% " / 1.3 53% water - 47% ethanol / 3.4 36% " -
64% " / 2.2 20% " - 80% " / 2.5 10% " - 90% " / .40 50% ethylene
glycol - 50% water / .85 @ 20C 10% " - 90% " / .6 @ 20C 70% methanol
- 30% water / 2.7 79% isopropanol - 21% water / .7 @ 20C 70% " - 30%
" / .65 @ 20C 31% glycerol - 69% ethanol / .5 12% " - 88% " /
.75 50% methanol - 50% isopropanol / 10 @ -78C
From "Ionizing Solvents" by I. Junder 1970 from a table and its
amendments and then text-
"NaOH....i[meaning insoluble in liquid
ammonia] Na2SO4...i (NH4)2SO4...i" "Alcohols: Simple and
polyfunctional alcohols are miscible with liquid ammoina. Phenols are
also soluble.
Ethers: Diethylether is moderately soluble [in liquid
ammonia]. Ethers having higher molecular weights are not very soluble.
Hydrocarbons: Alkanes are insoluble, while alkenes and alkynes are
slightly soluble. Benzene dissolves readily."
"All solutions of metals in liquid ammonia are metastable, though
they can be stored for long periods in the absence of catalysts
(impurities). Catalysts and in paticular finely divided metals
(platium asbestos, platium sponge, and raney nickel), favour
decompostion in accordence with: M + x NH3 --> M(NH2)x +
(x/2)H2 This decompostion is used for the preparation of alkali and
alkaline earth metal amides (amide reaction). It corresponds to the
reaction of alkali metals with water. The catalytic activity of many
metal salts (particularly iron salts) is due to the fact that the salt
is first reduced and the resulting finely divided metal catalyses
the amide formation."
|
FMAN Member |
posted 09-06-99 08:26 PM
Whats the X for? Ammonia is solvent [Y/n]? Ok so there is no ammonia in
X. X must equate to the amine? Amine is Split up at the NH2 likewise
right? So if we got brophion [wellbutrin] It the metal attacks the
electrisensitive region right? [or needs to be preped here?] Thus
busting it off Giving a methyl side branch chain to the x/2 this is free
in solution and ??? goes where? depends right.
So the target molecule is cleaved.
Right? at the NH2 region, which side of the NH2 where at
specifically????
>>>>>>>>Where does it
cleave???????????? ---Amethystium---
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 09-06-99 08:37 PM
The x stands for the number of molecules.
|
FMAN Member |
posted 09-06-99 08:41 PM
I definatly agree with orriginal statement #6 thus creating the
hydroxide. Salt turns into Clorine and Naoh so the molecule becomes
clorinated it seems in the divided electrocell, at the anode, and then
well if all the clorine is gone it starts burning the ox how much clorine
must be dissapated, if just the O is burned off the we got h2 in solution,
which O is prefered the O on the molecule or the H20? Do we swithch
solvent?
Obviously this patent is smorgasboard stuff, we can clorinate the
target simply enough, rip apart the end methyls with H202 or simmilar like
Iodine if need be. Or go with the electro------Zap target with rip apart
the end NH2 in sutable solvent, if demethylation presents few problems
then attack like stated zap the NH2 NH3 your getting the sequence right am
I???
Ok so after demathylation zapping the NH3 now turns to NH2 then what
NH1 Am I missing something essentil here or is the nitrogen getting ripped
off I know the hydrogen is getting burned...this is obvious What about
that nitrogen cleave? If thus free nitro is it!???!!!in
solution????
|
DRedge Member |
posted 09-06-99 08:47 PM
Seemigly overlooked???? In divided reaction at anode when making
clorine gas from sat salt solution are we waiting the initial perod for
clorine to sat does this mean O is being vaped off to provide room for the
ccl so we are getting CLh Clh or Clh2 so on and so forth What I am
gettign at issint there more going on thaan clorine and hydrogenations or
whatever nomenclature??? Thus after adding amine we got O burned off afer
X time then clorine must sat. yes? probabbly? yes. ok so the clorinated
mol. is preped?
What is happening to the Nitrogen???
|
FMAN Member |
posted 09-06-99 11:57 PM
Not nickel it forms poision. Ok so Pd acts in this fachion... It
adds free hydrogen radical to the N Nh2 becoming Nh3 the nitrogen
breaks off Thus we get in water the base effect Hydrogen is
produced, sudenly atomic molecules dont seem weird? Ok so the free
hydrogen goes to the Nitrogen and rips it off into water at the cathode?
In solvent it does something different it adds oh units as H is
abstracted into free form and disapates from solvent as h2,
thus>>>>>>>>the clorine is ripped outa where it we
dont want it right? and is replaced by Free H. So thus....Clorinating the
solvent is achived in this case, clorine is evacuated? Wheather or not the
membrane thing will work is highly suspect in my opinion. Hydrogen cloride
is produced not dry....and is nutaralized by the basity of the solution,
so there is clorine in the solvent rightnso and it is nuteral to the pH it
could be likewise tested for but it is essentially nutralized, I think the
amine must go OH if I recon eventually, unless the competing reaction NaOh
predominates this unfortunate thing, the small amount of clorine will do
something---otherwise it would not be topic of discussion? I need to
declorinate it righok then Nacl and remove the precipates? Ok ya got to
add some ecess metall then right? to diss the wandering clorine and it
gots to be removed as well as the oxygen its got to have a place togo aand
then the only thing left for the amine to grab is meth or hydrogen as long
as ripping the oh results in a precipate we dont goto wory about some
amine loss this way cause the clorine is replaced obviously with IODINE by
jov I think I figured it out  ---Amethystium---
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 09-07-99 09:26 PM
The orginal intent of this thread was to come up with a way to reduce the
ephedrine directly to meth, without any halogenating steps, or the like.
This method I'm describing reduces benzyl alcohols to the corresponding
aromatic.
There is no Cl(-), only e(-) and H(+).
|
DRedge Member |
posted 09-07-99 09:32 PM
Chem Guy Ok So I have been SASSY latly  Being
how everyone can do the thing with propane or something easy to get, could
you enlighten a possible pathway? Maybe we should use epinepherine at
least it aint got shit in it! Converting the epi to ephedrine should be a
cinch if need be? I dont know but we goto make our own stuff or improve
simple extraction method, I let sit in brine for a moth if it has
to????
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 09-07-99 10:10 PM
DRedge,
What propane thing? Enlighten me please.
As for the epinephrine, why would you want to turn it into ephedrine?
It would be easier to convert into methamphetamine.
If you ask a less cryptic question I might be able to help you,
otherwise I am in the dark as to what you mean.
Signed, confused...
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 09-08-99 11:30 PM
From "The Journal of Physical Chemistry", Vol 72, #4, page
1374-1378 "The electrolysis of quaternary ammonium salts in liquid
ammonia produces blue solutions, which have chemical properties similiar
to those of the metal-ammonia solutions..."
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 09-08-99 11:47 PM
From "Organic Chemistry: An Introduction and a Guide" , Edited by Manual
M. Baizer, 1973 "Solutions containing solvated electrons may be
produced in several ways,... by dissolving metals in suitable polar
solvents,... or by electrolysis....Absorption and EPR spectroscopy have
shown, at least for dilute solutions, that the properties of the solutions
are strickly similiar, whether these have been prepared by electrolysis or
by dissolving metals. ...In a solution of low concentrations a Birch
type of reduction is found,..." "The reaction between the solvated
electron and a solvent molecule is generally slow in the absense of a
proton donor. The stablity of the solvated electron in ammonia is well
known, and even their reaction with water in ammonia is slow. The
mechanism of the dissapearence of the solvated electrons in this medium
has been found to be as follows: H2O + NH3 <==> NH4(+) +
OH(-) e(-) in NH3 + NH4(+) --> 2 NH3 + .5 H2 "
|
FMAN Member |
posted 09-09-99 12:11 AM
Chem Guy Quanitary Ammonia is some scarry stuff. I would feel more comfy
with the explination of a CN work up at least if I goof up the test
animals die shortly, ammonia is gona take a while to figure... Imagine
exacuating a cylinder of amonia, now entrain a few drops of water through
the orfice from backpressure simply created no indepth instructions needed
here? Ok so foloow the idea of an amonia fountain there all of it the cyl
just snorts a line of pure dry whatever, let react and I got a way ok and
then evacuate off gass and then cut open if necessary to recover the
goods. We need an indepth explanation of the proposed
mechanics >>>>>>>>>>>>>...explain
outrigh as whole as possible lots of critism ecepted????? There are
millions of ways wich way is best? and for what reason? Reason 1 if
chemist is discovered in act? reason 2 if chemist does not want to be
discovered reson 3 if chemist want s to know entirely as many factors
concernng the proposed opperation of his idea... Enough
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 09-09-99 12:44 AM
Ooops! I wrote the wrong title of the book for the last reference. The
title should be "Organic Electrochemistry: An Introduction and a Guide"-
Sorry
FMAN- Quarenary ammmonium salts are found in over the counter products,
like water bed conditioner. I imagine that there are some that are
posionous, but I also imagine that water bed conditioner isn't deadly. As
for the rest of your write up, I don't quite understand what you are
asking in some places. But I haven't ever tryed this so I can't come up
with the best way to go about this procedure. I'm only trying to prove the
validity of the patent for birch-like reductions, and specficly for the
reduction of benzyl alcohols.
|
dwarfer Member |
posted 09-09-99 12:53 AM
Chem Guy, this is an interesting thread: I wish somebody would turn it
into a practical experiment.
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 09-09-99 03:28 PM
So go for it dwarfer, If you have tryed the other electrolysis methods
then you have all the necessary equipment and reagents, except for the
quarenary ammonium salt (Water-bed conditioner). At that point just go for
broke.
This process relies on the solvated electron, so no half-wave potintal
calcualtions need be done. To test it run current through the cell,
without the ephedrine in it, and increase the voltage until the solution
turns blue (the spectra for the solvated electron).
Seems real easy doesn't it?
Have fun!
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 09-09-99 03:35 PM
By the way: If it seems I'm suggesting something illegal, I'm not. All
this information above and below is for informative purposes only. I
disclaim all liablity for someone's stupidity that might get me in
trouble.
Post Script: The colder the solution the less the solvated electron
reacts with the solvent and the more it reacts with the aromatic
(Ephedrine in this specific case).
Also, NEVER use a Quarenary Ammonium Salt that has a benzene group on
it because the solvated electron will react with the QAS as well and the
ephedrine and the Aromatic-QAS will act competitively. You could however
run current through the cell before the addition of the Aromatic-QAS to
reduce the Aromatic-QAS to a saturated ring system so that it would
compete with the ephedrine.
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 09-09-99 03:37 PM
Jesus! The last line shouldn read "You could however run current
through the cell before the addition of the Aromatic-QAS to reduce the
Aromatic-QAS to a saturated ring system so that it wouldN'T compete
with the ephedrine.
|
CHEM
GUY Member |
posted 09-10-99 05:40 PM
From "Basics of Electroorganic Synthesis", by Demetrios K. Kyriacou, 1981
"If the cathode is made very negative (E = 2.68 V for the hydrated
electrons), electrons will be ejected from the cathode into the
surrounding molecules of the medium.... It is possible to use mixed
solvents provided one component is capable of solvating electrons....
Solutions containing free electrons are blue."
|
dwarfer Member |
posted 09-11-99 02:10 AM
You do know how to tempt a guy.
I'll make a vistation to the water bed store...
dwrfr
|